Deadline Live


Uncovering the news behind the news
It is currently Fri Sep 03, 2010 3:12 pm

All times are UTC





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: ZeitgeistChallenge.com responds to Acharya S
PostPosted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 5:03 am 
Offline
 E-mail  WWW  Profile

Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:48 pm
Posts: 89
A little while back Acharya S or (D.M. Murdock) author of the ‘The Christ Conspiracy’ and a consultant to part one of The Zeitgeist movie put out a video responding to all the websites and videos that debunk part one (the religion part) of The Zeitgeist movie.

My friend and I created http://zeitgeistchallenge.com a while back where we offer cash for anyone who can prove the claims zeitgeist makes about the similarities between Jesus and other gods. (no one has answered the challenge yet by the way)
we couldn’t believe the stuff that Acharya thought she could get away with in this video, So we thought we would take the time to point out some of the problems.

Its available at google video


Or at Youtube in three parts. (this is a “playlist” so they should play consecutively)
http://youtube.com/watch?v=jmUGPbNkFeU& ... playnext=1

Here is her original video
http://youtube.com/watch?v=F_9ZyddjaM4&feature=related

_________________
Image


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: ZeitgeistChallenge.com responds to Acharya S
PostPosted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 6:33 am 
Offline
 E-mail  Profile

Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2006 9:28 am
Posts: 3518
Location: Philadelphia, PA
dude i love you man but it's time to fucking give it up

_________________
I AM NEARLY 50 YEARS OLD BUT PRETEND TO BE 25, AND AM A GLORIFIED COLLEGE RADIO HOST WHO CAN'T SUPPORT MY FAMILY


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: ZeitgeistChallenge.com responds to Acharya S
PostPosted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 6:46 am 
Offline
 E-mail  Profile

Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2008 6:34 am
Posts: 261
Either participate in the debate or get the fuck out of the way.


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: ZeitgeistChallenge.com responds to Acharya S
PostPosted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 9:13 am 
Offline
User avatar
 WWW  ICQ  YIM  Profile

Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2005 6:09 am
Posts: 9416
Location: In front of my PC
http://www.zeitgeistmovie.com/transcript.htm
[web]http://www.zeitgeistmovie.com/transcript.htm[/web]


Attachments:
File comment: The Companion Guide to ZEITGEIST, Part 1

This is a 48-page ebook containing a scientific investigation of some of the facts from Part 1 of the ZEITGEIST movie, dealing with the comparisons of ancient religions and Christianity. Provided by comparative religion scholar - Acharya S

* Who are the Egyptian gods Horus and Set?

* Why does the battle between Horus and Set sound like that of Jesus and Satan?

* Was the baby Horus really born on December 25th, just like Jesus is traditionally supposed to have been? This ebook contains 11 pages of research on this important subject.

* Was Horus's mother truly a virgin called Isis-Mery? A 10-page discussion of the virginal status of Horus's mother, including citations of ancient texts in their original languages, with translations.


"The Companion Guide to Zeitgeist, Part 1, by Acharya S is an absolute must for anyone who wishes to fully understand the significance of the movie."
"Well-referenced, with numerous quotations from renowned Egyptologists and classical scholars, Acharya's penetrating research clearly lays out the very ancient pre-Christian basis of modern Christianity. Those who espouse Christianity beware! After digesting the evidence, you will never again view your religion in the same light."
- Robert M. Schoch, Ph.D. Division of Natural Science,
College of General Studies at Boston University
Author, Pyramid Quest, Voyages of the Pyramid
Builders and Voices of the Rocks


"This work helps lift the veil of suppression in regard to the truth behind the Christian religion and its Egyptian origins."
"Our appreciation should now evolve to the understanding of the mythical developments of the ancient world and their metaphoric foundations; not with the establishment dogma, which exists as a perversion of the original knowledge and poetry."
- Peter Joseph
Creator, "Zeitgeist, The Movie"


More info:
http://www.stellarhousepublishing.com/zeitgeist.html
PLEASE DONATE to Acharya S!

http://www.zeitgeistmovie.com

Zeitgeistebook.pdf [618.26 KB]
Downloaded 4 times

_________________
┌─────────────────────────────┐
. Artists Use Lies To Tell The Truth
. Politicians Use Lies To Cover It Up
├─────────────────────────────┤
Image
└─────────────────────────────┘
Top
 

 Post subject: Re: ZeitgeistChallenge.com responds to Acharya S
PostPosted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 7:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2005 7:29 pm
Posts: 6581
Location: UK
Zeitgeist is a sham. To be honest with you I can't be bothered with it, what utter bollocks.

Why talk about great information, and than introduce contentious issues like relegion! FFS.

In my book the entire thing is no different than what Icke does.

Fick Zeit and fuck Icke.

_________________
Close your eyes to reality and you invite your own destruction.


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: ZeitgeistChallenge.com responds to Acharya S
PostPosted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 9:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Sat Sep 24, 2005 11:14 pm
Posts: 393
I'm sick of seeing Zietgiest on Google video and having all these people ask me about it.

It's a pointless endevour..in fact I would say is counterproductive. How the hell are you going to make a movie and include 9/11, the Federal Reserve and Jesus stuff? It just contributes to information overload.


Its so broadbased, you cant come out with anything substantive...

"well, that was fucked up.....whats on T.V"


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: ZeitgeistChallenge.com responds to Acharya S
PostPosted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 9:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar
 WWW  ICQ  YIM  Profile

Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2005 6:09 am
Posts: 9416
Location: In front of my PC
Quote:
It just contributes to information overload.


what can possibly be wrong with information overload ?

Dr.Infomaniac.

_________________
┌─────────────────────────────┐
. Artists Use Lies To Tell The Truth
. Politicians Use Lies To Cover It Up
├─────────────────────────────┤
Image
└─────────────────────────────┘


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: ZeitgeistChallenge.com responds to Acharya S
PostPosted: Fri Jun 13, 2008 6:19 am 
Offline
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2007 5:45 pm
Posts: 158
Rob Bishop wrote:
dude i love you man but it's time to fucking give it up



Wow, I agree with Bishop on this one, Who gives a rats ass in a hat.

_________________
http://www.cakefarts.com


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: ZeitgeistChallenge.com responds to Acharya S
PostPosted: Fri Jun 13, 2008 6:24 am 
Offline
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2007 5:45 pm
Posts: 158
HankXavier wrote:
Either participate in the debate or get the fuck out of the way.

What debate HX? *kiss* missed you.

_________________
http://www.cakefarts.com


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: ZeitgeistChallenge.com responds to Acharya S
PostPosted: Sun Jun 15, 2008 7:04 am 
Offline
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 1:11 am
Posts: 369
Quote:
A straw man argument is an informal fallacy based on misrepresentation of an opponent's position.[1] To "set up a straw man" or "set up a straw man argument" is to describe a position that superficially resembles an opponent's actual view but is easier to refute, then attribute that position to the opponent (for example, deliberately overstating the opponent's position).[1] A straw man argument can be a successful rhetorical technique (that is, it may succeed in persuading people) but it carries little or no real evidential weight, because the opponent's actual argument has not been refuted.[2]

Its name is derived from the practice of using straw men in combat training.[citation needed] In such training, a scarecrow is made in the image of the enemy with the single intent of attacking it[3].[not in citation given] Such a target is, naturally, immobile and does not fight back, and is not as realistic to test skill against compared to a live and armed opponent. It is occasionally called a straw person argument,[4] straw dog fallacy, scarecrow argument, or wooden dummy argument.

_________________
Image


Top
 

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 

All times are UTC



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group  
Design By Poker Bandits